Of Love and Lies

By Bella DePaulo, Ph.D.

Ever wonder if an amour is fudging the facts? Here, we reveal the truth about dating and deception.
I kid you not: I’ve been studying the lies that people tell each other for more than two decades. If that sounds like a strange field of research, think about it this way—people lie, a lot, and those who happen to become the victim of such deception usually want to know about it. In no field is this more true that in love and relationships. Given that’s the case, I thought I’d reveal what some of the research has taught me about what people lie about, why, and how to tell if someone’s fibbing. Prepare for a very eye-opening look at the truth about deception in the dating world!



True lie #1: The most serious lies are told by (and to) the people we care about most. When we looked at the people who were involved in the most serious lies in people’s lives, either as the liars or as the targets of the lies, we found something important: The people we care about the most — such as close friends, romantic partners, spouses, and parents — were most likely to be involved in those events.


True lie #2: When it comes to little lies, though, our romantic partners see more of our true selves. Fellow researcher Debby Kashy and I asked 147 people to keep diaries, every day for a week, of all the lies they told and all the people they lied to. Not surprisingly, the vast majority of the lies were little lies. For example, people lied to make themselves look better than they really were, to avoid embarrassment or disagreements, or to get out of doing some small task that they did not feel like doing. In general, though, people told fewer of these little lies to the people they cared about the most. That usually meant romantic partners, but also included close friends and family members.



True lie #3: The more attractive you are, the more people will lie to you. Social psychologists Wade Rowatt, Michael Cunningham, and Perri Druen showed people photos of possible dates who were either considered to be very attractive or rather unattractive. Along with each picture was info about the person’s beliefs and preferences. When subjects were asked who they thought they’d get along with on a date, subjects lied most about their own beliefs and characteristics when faced with the prospect of an attractive date—if the hottie in photo #1 loved skiing, for example, subjects were prone to say, “I love skiing, too!” even if they’d barely hit the bunny slopes.



True lie #4: Romantic partners are worse than strangers at detecting each other’s fibs. Imagine that your partner is gazing at someone behind you, someone you can’t see, and you ask your partner, “Do you think that person you’re looking at is attractive?” Eric Anderson created a situation just like that for his dissertation. Sometimes the partners who were asked that question lied, and sometimes they told the truth. Turns out, people could distinguish their romantic partner’s lies from their truths only 52 percent of the time (when they would have gotten 50 percent right just by chance). Not a very impressive level of accuracy. Complete strangers, on the other hand, had a 58 percent accuracy rate in detecting that person’s fibs.



True lie #5: When asked to ’fess up to their most serious lie, affairs are by far the most common. No big surprise there! Although, let’s not discount the other doozies. Many of the lies were told to hide bad behaviors, such as squandering in the stock market the money that was supposed to go toward a down payment on a couple’s first home. Some people hide facts about their past that they find shameful, or they conceal information (such as a grim health diagnosis) that would be upsetting for the other person to hear. Some claim accomplishments (such as athletic prowess) or connections (with important people) that are purely fanciful. But by far the most common cover-up involved sleeping around behind someone’s back. (Continued)


True lie #6: If you admit to a lie, it might not save a relationship. Ever heard someone say “If only he/she had told me the truth, I could have forgiven him/her”? Not so. When communication professors Steven McCornack and Timothy Levine asked 190 people to describe instances in which a partner had lied to them, they found that whether the relationship survived depended more on what was lied about than the fact that the person had lied, period. For example, the fact that a romantic partner had an affair was more likely to doom a relationship than the fact that the partner lied about the affair. So in other words, confessing to a big fib like an affair won’t necessarily absolve you.



True lie #7: Think liars don’t care about other people? Often, just the opposite is the caseOne of our stereotypes about liars is that they’re cold, scheming, manipulative, and don’t really care about people. Some liars really are that way. But far more people lie because they do care. Liars are frequently tempted to fib when they think that other people would not like them just the way they are. So they lie and pretend to be different so that other people will like, respect, or care about them more.



True lie #8: “I did it for you” —that’s what people claim when they tell lies to their romantic partners. In a study of lying between exes, social psychologists Mary Kaplar and Anne Gordon asked people to describe a time when they lied to their romantic partner, and a time when their romantic partner lied to them. Liars said they had their partner’s best interests in mind when they lied. For example, they said they were trying to avoid upsetting their partner or hurting their partner’s feelings. The partners who were the targets of lies, however, didn’t feel the same way.



True lie #9: Even after lying to their romantic partners, liars claim that they are not bad people. Kaplar and Gordon found that people who lie to their romantic partners do typically feel guilty about their lies. But they do not think that they are bad or even dishonest people. Instead, they think of themselves as basically honest people who got caught in a bad situation. Bella DePaulo is a social psychologist, visiting professor at UC Berkeley and the author of Singled Out: How Singles are Stereotyped, Stigmatized, And Ignored and Still Live Happily Ever After.

someone

why did i ever care for someone
who doesn't care for me.
why did i ever loved someone
who doesn't love me

why do i have to play the game of love
just to feel and suffer the pain.

i'm not trying to be any kind of man
i'm trying to be someone that you can
trust, love and understand

and i know i can be a part of you
and that is all i want to do.....

year 1991, from bien





The top 10 irritating Pinoy expressions

Monday, January 5. 2009

Last November, the folks at Oxford University came out with a list of “top ten irritating expressions” in the English language, by which I suppose they meant the English language as it’s employed in their corner of the English-speaking world, and not necessarily in what used to be the backwaters of the Bard’s dominion, in places like India and the Philippines. “Irritating” is, of course, a matter of cultural and personal predisposition. One man’s joke—such as the “Barack the Magic Negro” song that top Republicans passed among themselves—could be another man’s slur, and what annoys an American—such as a Pinoy texting in the middle of conversation—might be perfectly normal to the other fellow.



So the Oxford list might cause some of us to just go “Eh?”, but it’s always interesting to see what ticks off other people. Now let’s see which among the following words or phrases feels like a bug in your ear:



1. At the end of the day

2. Fairly unique

3. I personally

4. At this moment in time

5. With all due respect

6. Absolutely

7. It's a nightmare

8. Shouldn't of

9. 24/7

10. It's not rocket science



Well, come now, that wasn’t too bad, was it? We hear these expressions hereabouts now and then, but not that often, so they don’t grate on us as they might with the English. For example, we hardly ever say, “It’s not rocket science,” because, well, we don’t have rocket science in this country. Indeed we have our own, uhm, fairly unique ways of putting things and of getting annoyed by them. I’ve compiled my own list of irritating expressions in English as we Filipinos use the language among ourselves, with others, over the airwaves, in the office, in conferences, and in the papers. I’m sure you can add to this list—do send me your pet peeves—and this comes with the caveat that the annoyance may be entirely mine. If they don’t bother you, then don’t lose any sleep over them; Lord knows we suffer enough aggravations in this life and in this country without having to be upset by wrong or awkward prepositions. (Speaking of which, a reader wrote in recently to say how he or she—there was no name in the email address—failed to appreciate whatever I was doing in my column-piece on getting a La-Z-Boy, because I had committed the grievous error of saying “in the mall” instead of “at the mall” in my first sentence. I said I agreed that “at the mall” was probably the preferred and “correct” form, but I also asked him/her to Google the whole phrase “in the mall” to see how it’s entered common usage. Language—unfortunately or otherwise—isn’t graven in stone like math, perhaps to the distress of ruler-toting schoolmarms; one billion people saying “1+1=3” isn’t going to make it so. But if enough people—including influential writers and editors in places like Newsweek and The New York Times—say “different than” instead of “different from,” which I’m sticking with only because it’s what I’ve been used to, then the language will change; it already has. This might as well be the place for me to remind readers that while I do teach English and while I deeply value and enjoy language as a writer, I don’t think of myself as a stickler for rules, as some would like me to be. I cringe at bad language and poor grammar, but there are far worse things in life to fret over, and some of the worst damage to English is being perpetrated by some fools in Congress who insist on an English-only policy when they can barely speak or write it. I once had to sit through a hearing where a congressman held forth on “the youngs, the youngs of this country!”)But here’s my list of the ten most irritating Pinoy expressions in English—irritating not necessarily because they’re wrong (although some are), but because they’re everywhere you look and listen.1. “In fairness.” The most popular phrase in Pinoy showbiz, where fairness is apparently in great demand. Every time I hear this, my mind goes, “In fairness to whom or to what?”, but you never get to hear the other end of the phrase, so much so that you begin to suspect that the speaker really means “In fairness to me!”2. “As far as.” I don’t mean “as far as the eye can see,” but “As far as accommodations, everything is already taken care of” (or, more likely in these parts, “taken cared of”) or “As far as Manny Pacquiao, either Hatton or Mayweather will be okay for his next fight.” As in the above, I keep looking for the missing “is (or are) concerned” after “as far as”—but it looks like that’s as far as most people will go.3. “At this point in time,” the Pinoy version of “At this moment in time.” I can recall precisely when I began hearing this wondrously redundant expression over the airwaves—during the coverage of the 1986 EDSA revolt and its aftermath, from which point (in time?) it became a staple of reporters and broadcasters. Why not just say, “at this point” or “at this time” or the even more economical “today” or “now”?4. “Remains to be.” Not in the sense of “It remains to be seen if Filipinos will finally vote for the right person,” but rather “The deposit remains to be unclaimed” or “This painter remains to be unappreciated by the critics.” “To be”? Not to be!5. “Wherein.” I don’t know how this word crept into the vocabulary and overran the place, rather like the carnivore snail someone imported that ate up all the other garden creatures both good and bad, but you hear it everywhere, taking over where (or wherein?) the good old “where” (or, sometimes, the more precise “whereby”) should suffice. Hear this: “The house wherein the hero was born will be turned into a museum.” Want to have some fun? Google these two words together: “wherein” and “Philippines.” You’ll find choice examples like “He entered the University of the Philippines wherein he studied Medicine.”6. “Demand for.” I’ve already written about this before, but obviously no one in government and corporate officialdom reads me, so we still have signs screaming “Demand for your receipt!”7. “Literally.” Don’t people know that “literally” means, well, “literally”? I’ve heard people say “I’m so hungry I could literally eat a horse!” Really? I tried horsemeat once, in little nibbles—no, it didn’t taste like chicken—so I guess I could say “I literally ate horse,” but literally eating a horse will require hunger the size of Africa.8. “Whatever.” You ask someone a perfectly good question you’ve taken minutes to compose, and that person shrugs her shoulders or rolls his eyes and says “Whateverrrr….” Don’t you just want to strangle that person on the spot?9. “Wholistic/holistic.” First of all, just how do you spell this thing? Does it come with a W or not? The medical dictionary defines “holism” (no W) as “the conception of a man as a functioning whole.” But then you have websites devoted to “The Wholistic Pet” and “Wholistic Health Solutions” (which, incidentally, sells the Home Colon Cleaning Kit). This word (with or without the W—whatever) seems to be one of those warm and fuzzy buzzwords that came in with New Age music, organic tomatoes, and NGOs. (I’ll talk about “stakeholders” some other day.)10. “Multiawarded.” It’s No. 10 on this list, but it tops my list of Ugliest Frankenwords in the Universe. Of course, it’s popular because it does the job of saying “He (or she) has won not just one but many prizes!” Anyone should be happy to be multiawarded, and I should be honored that this word’s been often applied to me in introductions and such—but it isn’t false modesty at work when you see me wincing at the word. “Prizewinning” will do. Or, better yet, “many-splendored.” But that would no longer be me.



Email me at penmanila@yahoo.com, and visit my blog at www.penmanila.net.

Heart Attacks And Drinking Warm Water





















This is a very good article. Not only about the warm water after your meal, but about Heart Attacks .

The Chinese and Japanese drink hot tea with their meals, not cold water, maybe it is time we adopt their drinking habit while eating. For those who like to drink cold water, this article is applicable to you. It is nice to have a cup of cold drink after a meal. However, the cold water will solidify the oily stuff that you have just consumed. It will slow down the digestion. Once this 'sludge' reacts with the acid, it will break down and be absorbed by the intestine faster than the solid food. It will line the intestine. Very soon, this will turn into fats and lead to cancer. It is best to drink hot soup or warm water after a meal.


Common Symptoms Of Heart Attack...
A serious note about heart attacks - You should know that not every heart attack symptom is going to be the left arm hurting . Be aware of intense pain in the jaw line . You may never have the first chest pain during the course of a heart attack. Nausea and intense sweating are also common symptoms. 60% of people who have a heart attack while they are asleep do not wake up. Pain in the jaw can wake you from a sound sleep. Let's be careful and be aware. The more we know, the better chance we could survive.




A cardiologist says if everyone who reads this message sends it to 10 people, you can be sure that we'll save at least one life. Read this & Send to a friend. It could save a life. So, please be a true friend and send this article to all your friends you care about.










________________________________________________________________

lesson in Catholic History: Twelve Days of Christmas Explained

There is one Christmas Carol that has always baffled me. What in the world do leaping lords, French hens, swimming swans, and especially the partridge who won't come out of the pear tree have to do with Christmas?
Today, I found out.
From 1558 until 1829, Roman Catholics in England were not permitted to practice their faith openly. Someone during that era wrote this carol as a catechism song for young Catholics. It has two levels of meaning: the surface meaning plus a hidden meaning known only to members of their church. Each element in the carol has a code word for a religious reality which the children could remember..
1 - The partridge in a pear tree was Jesus Christ.
2 - Two turtle doves were the Old and New Testaments.
3 - Three French hens stood for faith, hope and love.
4 - The four calling birds were the four gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke & John.
5 - The five golden rings recalled the Torah or Law, the first five books of the Old Testament.
6 - The six geese a-laying stood for the six days of creation.
7 - Seven swans a-swimming represented the sevenfold gifts of the Holy Spirit: Prophesy, Serving, Teaching, Exhortation, Contribution, Leadership, and Mercy.
8 - The eight maids a-milking were the eight beatitudes.
9 - Nine ladies dancing were the nine fruits of the Holy Spirit: Love, Joy, Peace, Patience, Kindness, Goodness, Faithfulness, Gentleness, and Self Control.
10 - The ten lords a-leaping were the ten commandments.
11 - The eleven pipers piping stood for the eleven faithful disciples.
12 - The twelve drummers drumming symbolized the twelve points of belief in the Apostle's Creed.

So there is your history for today. This knowledge was shared with me and I found it interesting and enlightening and now I know how that strange song became a Christmas Carol .
Nice to know the meaning! For your information, please.